
You can disagree, but you would be wrong. Unless you said 'Diplo', in which case, 'okay, yeah, maybe, I guess'.
'It was like listening to a piece of vocal percussion or an inverted tone poem.' 'The letter 'o' continually propagates itself...as such I found the symbol of the O appearing almost subliminally inside my poem.' Oh, poets.
| 28. | Were you born between 1900-1950? Yes. | |
| 27. | I guessed that it was the Dalai Lama? Close. | |
| 26. | Are you found in history books? Yes. | |
| 25. | Are you part of a team? No. | |
| 24. | Are you a scientist? No. | |
| 23. | Do you have gray hair? No. | |
| 22. | Are you under 40 years old? No. | |
| 21. | Were you popular in the '70s? No. | |
| 20. | I guessed that it was Kenneth Branagh? Wrong. | |
| 19. | I guessed that it was Mika Häkkinen? Wrong. | |
| 18. | Are you a sex symbol? No. | |
| 17. | Are you often criticized? Yes. | |
| 16. | Are you skinny? No. | |
| 15. | Are you still alive? Yes. | |
| 14. | Are you bossy? No. | |
| 13. | Are you still on the air? No. | |
| 12. | Are you American? No. | |
| 11. | Do you have dark hair? No. | |
| 10. | Do you play an indoor sport? No. | |
| 9. | Have you ever won the World Series? No. | |
| 8. | Are you funny? No. | |
| 7. | Do you wear makeup? No. | |
| 6. | Are you Austrian? No. | |
| 5. | Were you popular in the '90s? Yes. | |
| 4. | Are you a lead singer? No. | |
| 3. | Have you performed live since 2000? Yes. | |
| 2. | Do you have long hair? No. | |
| 1. | Do you have children? No. |


"Members
Robertson "Robbie" Furze – vocals, guitar, programming
Milo Cordell – keyboards, synthesizer, programming
Joined live by:
Jo Apps (sister of Patrick Wolf) – backing vocals
Valentine Fillol-Cordier – backing vocals
Akiko Matsuura (of PRE, Comenechi) – drums
Daniel O'Sullivan (of Guapo, Sunn O))), et al.) – bass
Leopold Ross – bass "The whole thing reeks of V*CE overrated cool. Can this please be the last post on the internet about The Big Pink?
| Track | Duration | Date | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 18 Jul 2009, 23:56 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 25 Jun 2009, 18:39 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 18 Jun 2009, 23:17 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 30 May 2009, 00:50 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 22 May 2009, 00:05 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 12 Feb 2009, 23:58 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 31 Jan 2009, 20:18 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 28 Jan 2009, 03:04 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 26 Jan 2009, 00:01 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 24 Jan 2009, 03:18 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 22 Jan 2009, 02:11 | |||||
| 2:45 A.M. | 3:18 | 22 Jan 2009, 01:03 |

1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.
2. Give enough direct quotation—at least one extended passage—of the book's prose so the review's reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.
3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy précis.
4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending.…
5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author's oeuvre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it's his and not yours?To these concrete five might be added a vaguer sixth, having to do with maintaining a chemical purity in the reaction between product and appraiser. Do not accept for review a book you are predisposed to dislike, or committed by friendship to like. Do not imagine yourself a caretaker of any tradition, an enforcer of any party standards, a warrior in any ideological battle, a corrections officer of any kind. Never, never...try to put the author "in his place," making of him a pawn in a contest with other reviewers. Review the book, not the reputation. Submit to whatever spell, weak or strong, is being cast. Better to praise and share than blame and ban. The communion between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys of reading, and all our discriminations should curve toward that end.
(literally taken directly from wikipedia, soz)
